AT&T faces accusations of anti-competitive practices, despite earlier phone unlocking policies.

Some consumers will be hurt if the FCC allows carriers to unlock phones earlier.
A mobile device repair shop owner reports a frustrating issue with AT&T warranty replacements. The owner says that while iPhone 13 through 15 series replacements unlock quickly when activated on a postpaid line via AT&T's portal, the iPhone 16 series replacements are being blocked. The repair shop owner, with Reddit username SnooMacaroons3760, states that these iPhone 16 devices have clean IMEI numbers, indicating they haven't been reported lost or stolen.
Despite the clean IMEI numbers, AT&T is allegedly preventing these phones from being unlocked. The shop owner recalls instances of Apple Senior Advisors needing to explain FCC unlocking requirements to AT&T's senior support staff during support calls. Allegedly, only after considerable time and debate would AT&T unlock the phones.
SnooMacaroons3760 believes this is intentional, stating that AT&T appears to be deliberately obstructing iPhone 16 warranty unlocks, which he sees as a violation of FCC rules and an anti-consumer practice.
One possible reason for AT&T's alleged actions could be to prevent customers from switching carriers with their replacement iPhone 16. AT&T may also want to ensure customers fulfill their 36-month financing agreements. A locked phone could give AT&T more leverage, making it difficult for customers to switch providers.
However, a former Metro representative points out that early unlocking isn't always beneficial for consumers. MVNOs like Metro, Cricket, and Boost operate by selling older phones at a loss, recouping costs through service subscriptions.
The former Metro employee explains that prepaid companies typically don't profit from a customer until they've had service for 6 to 12 months. Stricter unlocking policies could eliminate prepaid promotions, harming those who rely on them most. He says that the current system allows many low-income families to have iPhones.
He says that he acquired multiple iPhones for little money with prepaid promotions, and forcing wireless firms to unlock phones earlier could negatively impact those who depend on such offers to own smartphones.
He says that he acquired multiple iPhones for little money with prepaid promotions, and forcing wireless firms to unlock phones earlier could negatively impact those who depend on such offers to own smartphones.
From the perspective of a prepaid carrier, requiring customers to remain for a certain period to become profitable makes quick unlocking undesirable. Thus, compelling carriers to unlock phones early may not be in every consumer's best interest, potentially ending promotions that enable smartphone ownership for low-income individuals.
In other news, "Iconic Phones: Revolution at Your Fingertips," a coffee table book about the 21st century's technological revolution, will be released in a few months. Follow the link for more details.